Copyright and Its Rewards, Foreseen and Unforeseen
Responding to Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1569 (2009)
Response to Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives
Vol. 122 No. 6
Harvard Law Review Forum
The Harvard Law Review Forum is the online companion to the print journal. It hosts scholarly discussion of our print content and timely reactions to recent developments. The Forum publishes Responses, Essays, Commentaries, and Book Reviews, and gladly accepts submissions for consideration.
Statistics is a Plural Word
Responding to D. James Greiner, Causal Inference in Civil Rights Litigation, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 533 (2008)
Response to Causal Inference in Civil Rights Litigation
Vol. 122 No. 2
Law (Makers) of the Land: The Doctrine of Treaty Non-Self-Execution
Responding to Carlos Manuel Vázquez, Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 599 (2008)
Response to Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and the Judicial Enforcement of Treaties
Vol. 122 No. 2
The Perils of the Fight Against Cognitive Illiberalism
Responding to Dan M. Kahan, David A. Hoffman, and Donald Braman, Whose Eyes Are You Going To Believe? Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 837 (2009).
Response to Whose Eyes are you Going to Believe? Scott v. Harris and the Perils of Cognitive Illiberalism
Vol. 122 No. 3
A ‘Hard Core’ Case Against Judicial Review
Responding to Richard H. Fallon, Jr., The Core of an Uneasy Case For Judicial Review, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1693 (2008)
Response to The Core of an Uneasy Case For Judicial Review
Vol. 121 No. 7
Bebchuk’s “Case for Increasing Shareholder Power”: An Opposition
Responding to Lucian Bebchuk, The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 833 (2005)
Vol. 120 No. 7