Vol. 136 No. 7 In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would support preserving a judicial precedent,...
Vol. 136 No. 7 Introduction We are grateful to the Harvard Law Review Forum for the chance to respond in these pages to The Executive Power of Removal....
Vol. 136 No. 7 Abstract Our system of stare decisis enables and encourages people to rely on judicial decisions to form expectations about their legal rights and duties...
Vol. 136 No. 7 A quick scan of LGBTQ-rights victories from the last two decades paints an indisputable picture of progress, a triumphant string of Supreme Court decisions...
Vol. 136 No. 5 “It is a settled and invariable principle,” Chief Justice Marshall once wrote, “that every right, when withheld, must have a remedy.” Not quite. Although some view the idea of a substantive constitutional right without a remedy as oxymoronic, rights to remedies have always had a precarious constitutional status, which the Supreme Court has lately subjected to multifaceted subversion. . . .
Vol. 136 No. 5 Natural law “still spooks many constitutional lawyers.” Justice Scalia, for example, was once asked: “Does natural law have a place in interpreting the Constitution?”...
Vol. 136 No. 5 Introduction City of Boston residents who wish to carry a handgun for self-defense must apply for a License to Carry Firearms (LTC) with the...
