Removal Rehashed
Response to The Executive Power of Removal
Vol. 136 No. 7
Introduction We are grateful to the Harvard Law Review Forum for the chance to respond in these pages to The Executive Power of Removal....
Harvard Law Review Forum
The Harvard Law Review Forum is the online companion to the print journal. It hosts scholarly discussion of our print content and timely reactions to recent developments. The Forum publishes Responses, Essays, Commentaries, and Book Reviews, and gladly accepts submissions for consideration.
Tangibility and Tainted Reliance in Dobbs
Response to Precedent, Reliance, and Dobbs
Vol. 136 No. 7
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would support preserving a judicial precedent,...
Of Systems Thinking and Straw Men
Response to Content Moderation as Systems Thinking
Vol. 136 No. 6
Introduction In Content Moderation as Systems Thinking, Professor Evelyn Douek, as the title suggests, endorses an approach to the people, rules, and processes governing...
The Unpragmatic Family Law of Marginalized Families
Response to Pragmatic Family Law
Vol. 136 No. 6
Introduction In her excellent article Pragmatic Family Law, Professor Clare Huntington argues that divisive issues roiling U.S. politics, law, and society — such as abortion rights,...
Disobedience, Medicine, and the Rule of Law
Response to Medical Disobedience
Vol. 136 No. 5
Professor Dov Fox’s Medical Disobedience could not have appeared at a more consequential time for the medical profession. Just look at what is happening...
Interrogating Dominion: On Political Theology and Summary Process Eviction in Connecticut
Vol. 136 No. 4
The Bible, the Greeks: What is the nature of these texts’ openness to the whole world? On the one hand, for [Emmanuel] Levinas, they...
The Anti-Klan Act in the Twenty-First Century
Vol. 136 No. 4
Racial terrorism by organized hate groups and “lone wolf” vigilantes presents a growing societal danger. Increasingly, the planning and recruitment for such plots occur...
Separation of Powers and Thuraissigiam: The Entry Fiction as Judicial Aggrandizement
Vol. 136 No. 3
In Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, the Supreme Court rejected Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam’s challenge to the procedurally threadbare “expedited removal” he faced. The Court...
A Plea for Affirmative Action
Vol. 136 No. 3
Affirmative action in the form of race-conscious admissions is being legally challenged by a conservative activist organization . During the Supreme Court’s 2022 October...
Juridical Discourse for Platforms
Response to Content Moderation as Systems Thinking
Vol. 136 No. 2
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has created a private “Supreme Court,” or so he says. Since 2021, his company’s Oversight Board has issued verdicts on...