National Security
A Label Covering a “Multitude of Sins”: The Harm of National Security Deference
Forum response to Professor Chesney's Comment
Civil Rights
-
-
Bivens Claims
Egbert v. Boule
Fifty-one years ago, in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, the Supreme Court announced a cause of action for money damages against…
-
Environmental Law
Rollerson v. Brazos River Harbor Navigation District
Fifth Circuit Judges Cast Doubt on Environmental Justice Suits
-
Civil Rights
The Coherence of Prison Law
Introduction In their welcome new article, Justin Driver and Emma Kaufman offer a provocative take on American prison law: that it is “fundamentally incoherent.”Justin Driver & Emma Kaufman, The Incoherence…
-
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles
Ninth Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc to Consider Whether a Miranda Violation Can Give Rise to a Claim under § 1983
-
Constitutional Law
The Incoherence of Prison Law
In recent years, legal scholars have advanced powerful critiques of mass incarceration. Academics have indicted America’s prison system for entrenching racism and exacerbating economic inequality. Scholars have said much less…
-
Election Law
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
-
Qualified Immunity
Taylor v. Riojas
-
Civil Rights
Title VII and Caste Discrimination
-
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Junior
Eleventh Circuit Holds that a Florida Jail Was Not Deliberately Indifferent to the Spread of COVID-19.