Like every academic journal, the Harvard Law Review has rigorous editorial processes governing how it solicits, evaluates, and determines when and whether to publish a piece. An intrinsic feature of these internal processes is the confidentiality of our 104 editors’ perspectives and deliberations. Last week, the full body met and deliberated over whether to publish a particular Blog piece that had been solicited by two editors. A substantial majority voted not to proceed with publication.
More from the Blog
-
Constitutionally Adequate Immigration Bond Procedures
Elizabeth Jordan
-
Is Access to Fable an Export?
On June 12, the Commerce Department directed Anthropic to deny foreign nationals access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, regardless of where... -
IEEPA Overextension and the First Amendment
On May 13, 2026, Judge Leon of the D.C. District Court temporarily enjoined on First Amendment grounds U.S. financial sanctions and travel restrictions against...