Vol. 139 No. 1 Professor Richard Re’s Foreword pursues a comparison between the Warren Court and the current Court in the hope that “[s]eeing the similarities between these...
Vol. 139 No. 1 The Warren Court’s legacy is ubiquitous. With the eponymous Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the Supreme Court featured a
strong majority of left-of-center jurists, and those “liberal lions” ruled (or roared) accordingly.
Vol. 139 No. 1 Article III protects federal judges with life tenure and salary guarantees. But politics still impacts federal courts, especially the Supreme Court.
Vol. 139 No. 1 If the Warren Court reflected nearly twenty years of jurisprudence dismantling ugly systems of oppression and institutional injustice that embedded invidious practices and policies into American law and society...
Vol. 139 No. 1 In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a state law that prohibits transgender minors from accessing gender-affirming care.
Vol. 139 No. 1 A revolution has occurred in the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Supreme Court has greatly expanded the scope of the Free Exercise Clause.
Vol. 139 No. 1 The Supreme Court has consistently confirmed that nonobscene sexually explicit content is First Amendment–protected expression. It has treated this sexually explicit content the same...
Vol. 139 No. 1 Since it burst into American public consciousness in 2018, TikTok has amassed roughly 170 million monthly U.S. users and more than one billion worldwide...