Vol. 139 No. 1 Sixteen years ago, Justice Scalia warned of an “evil day on which the [Supreme] Court will have to confront the question: Whether, or to...
Vol. 139 No. 1 Civil litigants presumptively bear their own costs. Only “express statutory authorization” can justify a departure from the default “principle that ‘the prevailing litigant is...
Vol. 139 No. 1 If there were ever a “First Commandment” of the federal judiciary, one candidate might be an oft-quoted phrase from Marbury v. Madison: “It is...
Employment antidiscrimination law has been steadily eroding, the result of a dilemma it has never fully resolved: its relationship with identity. I. From Ricci...
Vol. 138 No. 7 In his important article, Determining Rights, Professor Jud Campbell correctly observes that “[t]wo central problems in rights jurisprudence are figuring out who should make” “specifications” about what a right “demands in particular situations” and “how to make them.”
Response to Structural Logics of Presidential Disqualification
Vol. 138 No. 6 Trump v. Anderson and Trump v. United States were two momentous decisions in a momentous Supreme Court term. Sharing then-former — and now current — President Trump as...
Response to The Demise of Deference — And the Rise of Delegation to Interpret?
Vol. 138 No. 3 [I]t was morning, and lo! now it is evening, and nothing memorable is accomplished. — Henry David Thoreau The writing was on the wall,...