Coming out of Wednesday’s arguments in Trump v. Hawaii, the dominant view—see, for example, here, here, and here—was that the federal government was likely...
Vol. 131 No. 6 Federal substantive criminal law and constitutional remedies might seem to be distinct bodies of law. But since the closing decades of the twentieth century,...
After waiting, and waiting, and waiting, the United States Supreme Court finally answered the question whether it would heed Pennsylvania Republicans’ calls to put...
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the Microsoft Ireland case – the high-profile dispute between Microsoft and the United States regarding the reach...
Vol. 131 No. 3 The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. has raised concerns within the healthcare community and beyond that Armstrong’s limitation...
Vol. 131 No. 2 In November 2014, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a complaint against Harvard College in federal district court. SFFA claims that Harvard discriminates against...
Laws banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation — like laws banning discrimination on the grounds of race, sex, and other significant statuses...
Next week’s oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop involves a familiar story: Three customers walk into a small business that sells specialty foods. The owner...