Constitutional Law Response

Constructing Constitutional Rights

Response to Determining Rights
Vol. 138 No. 7 In his important article, Determining Rights, Professor Jud Campbell correctly observes that “[t]wo central problems in rights jurisprudence are figuring out who should make” “specifications” about what a right “demands in particular situations” and “how to make them.”
Civil Rights Articles

The Forgotten History of Prison Law: Judicial Oversight of Detention Facilities in the Nation’s Early Years

Vol. 138 No. 7 Prison law is characterized by judicial deference to penal administrators. Despite the well-documented horrors that occur behind prison walls, federal and state courts often decline to intervene, asserting, among other things, that prisoners’ rights are limited and that the judicial branch lacks the power and expertise to get involved in the inner workings of detention facilities. Moreover, jurists often assume that the nation’s first courts largely stayed out of prisons and jails, and contemporary judicial deference is therefore historically rooted.
Immigration Law Articles

The Law and Lawlessness of U.S. Immigration Detention

Vol. 138 No. 5 The United States operates the largest immigration detention system in the world. Immigrants and watchdog groups have reported poor conditions of confinement, including medical mistreatment and neglect, inadequate nutrition, unsanitary conditions, and overcrowding. To challenge these conditions of confinement...
Constitutional Law Articles

Determining Rights

Vol. 138 No. 4 This Article explores Founding-era views about the grounding of constitutional rights and how those rights obtained determinate legal content. Today, we typically view constitutional rights as textually grounded, gaining their force through ratification, and we treat the task of determining their content as a question of law — that is, a question for judges to decide using legal criteria.