A Label Covering a “Multitude of Sins”: The Harm of National Security Deference
Forum response to Professor Chesney's Comment
Response to No Appetite for Change: The Supreme Court Buttresses the State Secrets Privilege, Twice
Vol. 136 No. 1
Evidence
No Appetite for Change: The Supreme Court Buttresses the State Secrets Privilege, Twice
Comment on United States v. Husayn (Zubaydah) and FBI v. Fazaga
Vol. 136 No. 1
Privacy as Privilege: The Stored Communications Act and Internet Evidence
Vol. 134 No. 8
This Article exposes a profound and growing injustice that major technology companies have propagated through every level of the judiciary under the guise of...
State v. Andrews
Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds that Compelled Disclosure of Defendant’s iPhone Passcodes Does Not Violate the Self-Incrimination Clause.
Vol. 134 No. 6
Plummer v. University of Houston
Fifth Circuit Holds that Due Process Standards May Be Lowered in the Presence of “Overwhelming” Video and Photographic Evidence of Guilt.
Vol. 131 No. 2
Haskins v. 3M Co.
District of South Carolina Holds the Every Exposure Theory Insufficient to Demonstrate Specific Causation Even if Legal Conclusions Are Scientifically Sound.
Vol. 131 No. 2
Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
Vol. 131 No. 1
The jury is a semi-sacred institution in the American legal system. The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to “trial, by an impartial...
Applying Empirical Psychology to Inform Courtroom Adjudication — Potential Contributions and Challenges
Modern Courts Commentary Series
Vol. 130 No. 8
Why Do Courts Defer to Cops?
Responding to Anna Lvovsky, The Judicial Presumption of Police Expertise
Response to The Judicial Presumption of Police Expertise
Vol. 130 No. 8
The Burden of Proof and the Presentation of Forensic Results
Forensic Commentary Series
Vol. 130 No. 5