Vol. 139 No. 8 Government speech doctrine can be a silver bullet for government defendants facing First Amendment free speech claims. If the government is speaking, its regulation...
Vol. 139 No. 7 While it is well established that a finding of viewpoint discrimination suffices to hold government regulation of speech unconstitutional in nonschool contexts, the interaction...
The organizations that accredit colleges and universities by definition influence much of what institutions of higher education do and how they do it. For...
Vol. 139 No. 5 At some point, less than two decades after the United States Supreme Court found racial segregation in the public schools to be unconstitutional, the...
Vol. 139 No. 3 In recent years, various legislative and school board actions have sought to restrict or censor educational content related to race, gender, sexuality, and identity.1 One prominent example is Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Act2 — the “Don’t Say Gay” law — which prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in certain grades.
Vol. 139 No. 2 The United States government now gives an extraordinary amount of money to colleges and universities. If it threatens to withhold some of that money, it might be able to achieve important and legitimate goals. It can also create serious risks to educational institutions, perhaps even existential risks, and it might be able to use its power to move institutions in its politically preferred directions.
Vol. 139 No. 1 A revolution has occurred in the law of religious freedom. At this point, the picture is reasonably clear. The Supreme Court has greatly expanded the scope of the Free Exercise Clause.
Last month, Judge Richard Bennett of the District of Maryland ruled that the U.S. Naval Academy can continue using race in its admissions decisions. ...
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) Non-Compete Clause Rule (the “Rule”), finalized in spring 2024, effectively bans all non-compete clauses and “functional” non-compete clauses based...