These student-written pieces focus on one important case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court during the previous Term and form the “Leading Cases” section of the November Supreme Court issue. Comments are ten pages long and written during the summer between students’ second and third years.
Vol. 135 No. 1 A fundamental principle of the rule of law (and indeed, rationality) holds that like cases should be decided alike. The law of retro-activity —...
Vol. 135 No. 1 In September 2005, John Roberts was confirmed as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice’s ascendancy marked a concerted effort to promote...
Vol. 135 No. 1 Qualified immunity protects government officers from being sued for damages unless they have violated “clearly established” law. Following the high-profile police killings of spring...
Vol. 135 No. 1 Although “[s]unlight is said to be the best of disinfectants,” too much “sunlight” can be harmful. This tension has long undergirded the Freedom of...
Vol. 135 No. 1 When a federal officer violates somebody’s constitutional rights, what remedies are appropriate for a court to grant? In the landmark case Bivens v. Six...
Vol. 134 No. 1 A century ago, legal scholar Zechariah Chafee, Jr., summed up his view of the First Amendment’s limits, writing that “[y]our right to swing your...
Vol. 134 No. 1 “On the far end of the Trail of Tears [were] promise[s].” Much of federal Indian law jurisprudence is about whether promises to Indian tribes...
Vol. 134 No. 1 The Supreme Court once considered “reasonable suspicion” to be “one of the relatively simple concepts embodied in the Fourth Amendment.” Yet this ostensibly simple...
Vol. 134 No. 1 After the grand but doctrinally vacant pronouncements of District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Supreme Court rejected nearly...
Vol. 134 No. 1 President Trump has shown unprecedented resistance to congressional oversight. Recently, he enlisted the Supreme Court as a referee. Last Term, in Trump v. Mazars...