Vol. 128 No. 6 Legal Orientalism begins with a map of modern law in which the United States and China are located at opposite ends. America sees itself...
Vol. 128 No. 4 Ten years ago, an essay in The American Historical Review suggested that renewed attention to the Founding’s international context presaged a “paradigm shift in...
Responding to Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith & David H. Moore, Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (2007)
Response to Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie
Responding to Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith & David H. Moore, Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 869 (2007)
Response to Sosa, Customary International Law, and the Continuing Relevance of Erie
Vol. 122 No. 7 International law has long been viewed with suspicion in Anglo-American legal thought. Compared to the paradigm of domestic law, the international legal system seems different and deficient along a number of important dimensions. This Article questions the distinctiveness of international law by pointing out that constitutional law in fact shares all of the features that are supposed to make international law so dubious.
