The election of an African American as President of the United States has raised questions regarding the continued relevance and even constitutionality of various provisions of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Barack Obama’s apparent success among white voters in 2008 has caused some commentators to question the background conditions of racially polarized voting that are key to litigation under section 2 of the VRA. His success in certain states, such as Virginia, has also raised doubts about the formula for coverage of jurisdictions under section 5 of the VRA. This Article examines the data from the 2008 primary and general elections to assess the geographic patterns of racial differences in voting behavior. The data suggest that significant differences remain between white and minority voters and among jurisdictions that are covered and not covered by section 5 of the VRA. These differences remain even when controlling for partisanship, ideology, and a host of other politically relevant variables. This Article discusses the implications of President Obama’s election for legal conceptions of racially polarized voting and for decisions concerning which jurisdictions section 5 ought to cover.
Election Law Article 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1385
Race, Region, and Vote Choice in the 2008 Election: Implications for the Future of the Voting Rights Act
- Volume 123
- Issue 6
- April 2010
April 20, 2010
More from this Issue
The Uneasy Case for Product LiabilityVol. 123 No. 6 In this Article we compare the benefits of product liability to its costs and conclude that the case for product liability is weak for a wide range of products. One benefit of product liability is that it can induce firms to improve product safety. Even in the absence of product liability, however, firms would often be motivated by market forces to enhance product safety because their sales may fall if their products harm consumers. Moreover, products must frequently conform to safety regulations. Consequently, product liability might not exert a significant additional influence on product safety for many products – and empirical studies of several widely sold products lend support to this hypothesis.
The Best of a Bad Lot: Compromise and Hybrid Religious ExemptionsVol. 123 No. 6
Strauss v. Horton
California Supreme Court Classifies Proposition 8 as "Amendment" Rather than "Revision."Vol. 123 No. 6