Why Do Courts Defer to Cops?
Responding to Anna Lvovsky, The Judicial Presumption of Police Expertise
Response to The Judicial Presumption of Police Expertise
Vol. 130 No. 8
Responses
Patterns of Error
Responding to Justin Murray, A Contextual Approach to Harmless Error Review
Response to A Contextual Approach to Harmless Error Review
Vol. 130 No. 7
Empirically Validating the Police Liability Insurance Claim
Responding to John Rappaport, How Private Insurers Regulate Public Police
Response to How Private Insurers Regulate Public Police
Vol. 130 No. 6
Antitrust Law is Not That Complicated
Responding to Louis Kaplow, On the Relevance of Market Power
Response to On the Relevance of Market Power
Vol. 130 No. 5
What Makes a Method of Legal Interpretation Correct? Legal Standards vs. Fundamental Determinants
Response to The Law of Interpretation
Vol. 130 No. 4
Introduction William Baude and Stephen Sachs argue for the importance of the “law of interpretation” — legal standards that govern how statutes, constitutional provisions,...
Euro-Yearnings? Moving Toward a “Substantive” Registration-Based Trademark Regime
Responding to Rebecca Tushnet, Registering Disagreement: Registration in Modern American Trademark Law
Vol. 130 No. 3
Even a Dog: A Response to Professor Fallon
Responding to Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Constitutionally Forbidden Legislative Intent
Response to Constitutionally Forbidden Legislative Intent
Vol. 130 No. 2
Power in Public Law: Some Reactions
Responding to Daryl J. Levinson, The Supreme Court, 2015 Term — Foreword: Looking for Power in Public Law
Response to Looking for Power in Public Law
Vol. 130 No. 1
A Fool for the Original Constitution
Responding to Jamal Greene, The Supreme Court, 2015 Term — Essay: The Age of Scalia
Response to The Age of Scalia
Vol. 130 No. 1
Gridlock?
Responding to Josh Blackman, The Supreme Court, 2015 Term — Comment: Gridlock
Response to Gridlock
Vol. 130 No. 1