The Harvard Law Review Forum is the online companion to the print journal. It hosts scholarly discussion of our print content and timely reactions to recent developments. The Forum publishes Responses, Essays, Commentaries, and Book Reviews and gladly accepts submissions for consideration.
Response to The Incompatibility of Substantive Canons and Textualism
Vol. 137 No. 2 Introduction In an important new Article, The Incompatibility of Substantive Canons and Textualism, Professors Benjamin Eidelson and Matthew Stephenson argue that substantive canons cannot...
Response to Law Clerk Selection and Diversity: Insights from Fifty Sitting Judges of the Federal Courts of Appeals
Vol. 137 No. 2 Introduction It is my great good fortune to have been asked to comment on the remarkable Article Law Clerk Selection and Diversity: Insights from...
Response to The Constitution of American Colonialism
Vol. 137 No. 1 What are the borderlands? In her brilliant and sweeping exploration of the “constitution of American colonialism,” Professor Maggie Blackhawk references the borderlands dozens of...
Response to Roberts’s Revisions: A Narratological Reading of the Affirmative Action Cases
Vol. 137 No. 1 Introduction In her insightful Comment on Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc....
Vol. 137 No. 1 Introduction For the last decade, conservative Supreme Court Justices have repeatedly contended that opponents of marriage rights for same-sex couples are decent and fair-minded...
Response to Juridical Discourse for Platforms, Content Moderation as Systems Thinking
Vol. 136 No. 8 We understand why eighty-two percent of Americans regularly use social media. Social media networking platforms offer speedy communication and entertainment at no immediate cost...
Vol. 136 No. 7 In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court distinguished between different kinds of reliance interests — some that would support preserving a judicial precedent,...
Vol. 136 No. 7 Introduction We are grateful to the Harvard Law Review Forum for the chance to respond in these pages to The Executive Power of Removal....
Response to Content Moderation as Systems Thinking
Vol. 136 No. 6 Introduction In Content Moderation as Systems Thinking, Professor Evelyn Douek, as the title suggests, endorses an approach to the people, rules, and processes governing...
