Reclaim Idaho v. Denney
Idaho Supreme Court Retains Federal Framework for Assessing Standing to Sue in State Court
Vol. 135 No. 7
Standing
Trademark Injury in Law and Fact: A Standing Defense to Modern Infringement
Vol. 135 No. 2
Trademark law and the law of standing have grown apart. Trademark law has expanded to recognize infringement in the absence of concrete harm to...
California v. Texas
Vol. 135 No. 1
In the 2007 case Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court determined, in a 5–4 vote, that Massachusetts had standing to challenge the EPA’s failure...
Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
Vol. 135 No. 1
Scholars often analyze exercises of judicial review as a tension between two models of adjudication: the “dispute resolution model,” which limits federal courts to...
TransUnion v. Ramirez
Vol. 135 No. 1
To bring a lawsuit in federal court, a plaintiff must have Article III standing. While commentators perceived federal courts as having generally made it...
Ramirez v. TransUnion LLC
Ninth Circuit Holds that Absent Class Members Must Satisfy Article III Standing at the Damages Phase of a Class Action.
Vol. 134 No. 3
White v. Square, Inc.
California Supreme Court Holds that a Transaction Is Not Required to Sue Online Service Providers for Discrimination.
Vol. 133 No. 6
Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
Vol. 133 No. 1
Legislative standing is litigated with increasing frequency, and yet it is characterized by “various ad hoc pronouncements” amounting to “a grab bag of inconsistent...
An Abdication Approach to State Standing
Vol. 132 No. 4
During the Obama and Trump Administrations, state litigation has emerged as a powerful new tool for challenging federal policy. President Obama’s eight years in...
Judicial Intervention as Judicial Restraint
Vol. 132 No. 1
In Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court turned aside the most promising vehicle for adjudicating partisan gerrymandering claims since the Court first fully addressed...