Property and Projection
Vol. 133 No. 4
In cities across the country, artists, protesters, and businesses are using light projections to turn any building’s facade into a billboard without the owner’s...
Property
Ajemian v. Yahoo!, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds that Personal Representatives May Provide Lawful Consent for Release of a Decedent’s Emails.
Vol. 131 No. 7
What Is an “Electronic Will”?
Chapter Four
Vol. 131 No. 6
Murr v. Wisconsin
Vol. 131 No. 1
To evaluate a regulatory takings claim, a court must measure the economic loss caused by a challenged regulation (the numerator) with respect to a...
Durant v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission
D.C. Court of Appeals Determines a New Development Is Inconsistent with City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Vol. 130 No. 5
California Building Industry Ass’n v. City of San Jose
California Supreme Court Upholds Residential Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance.
Vol. 129 No. 5
Starr International Co. v. United States
Court of Federal Claims Holds that Government Acquisition of Equity Share in AIG Effected an Illegal Exaction.
Vol. 129 No. 3
Body Banking from the Bench to the Bedside
Vol. 129 No. 2
How much is a kidney worth? An ounce of breast milk? Genetic material from an individual facing a Parkinson’s diagnosis? In today’s America, it...
Horne v. Department of Agriculture
Vol. 129 No. 1
In its regulatory takings jurisprudence, the Supreme Court has attempted to balance its conscious avoidance of “set formulas” with its belief that certain regulatory...
Anticipatory Remedies for Takings
Vol. 128 No. 6
The Supreme Court has rendered two lines of decisions about the remedies available for a violation of the Takings Clause. One line holds that...