Response to Law Clerk Selection and Diversity: Insights from Fifty Sitting Judges of the Federal Courts of Appeals
Vol. 137 No. 2 Introduction It is my great good fortune to have been asked to comment on the remarkable Article Law Clerk Selection and Diversity: Insights from...
Response to Roberts’s Revisions: A Narratological Reading of the Affirmative Action Cases
Vol. 137 No. 1 Introduction In her insightful Comment on Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc....
Vol. 137 No. 1 Introduction In law, one of the stories told by some scholars is that legal opinions are not stories. The story goes: legal opinions are...
Vol. 136 No. 3 Affirmative action in the form of race-conscious admissions is being legally challenged by a conservative activist organization . During the Supreme Court’s 2022 October...
Vol. 136 No. 2 In 1951, a promising young student submitted his application to the School of Theology at Boston University. His application was compelling but contained a...
Vol. 136 No. 1 When it comes to people of color, the Roberts Court treats “racism” as if it is an objective fact — out there in the world, apparent to anyone who stumbles upon it. The Roberts Court invites observers to believe that it is just using simple common sense when it identifies, or refuses to identify, something as racism.
Vol. 131 No. 2 In November 2014, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) filed a complaint against Harvard College in federal district court. SFFA claims that Harvard discriminates against...