Corruption, Clients, and Political Machines


Stephen E. Sachs

Responding to Samuel Issacharoff, On Political Corruption, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 118 (2010)

In his comment on political corruption, Professor Samuel Issacharoff questions traditional accounts that aim to squeeze money out of politics entirely. Instead, he focuses on the danger that political spending will promote private influence over government policy. In this response, Professor Stephen E. Sachs argues that "private influence" is itself too broad a category to control, and that campaign finance policy should be restricted to a more manageable scope. Professor Sachs argues that if protecting the government from private influence is too diffuse a goal, we can at least attempt to protect the government from itself, by ensuring that it does not channel public resources into self-sustaining political machines.

124 Harv. L. Rev. F. 62 (2011) | DOWNLOAD PDF

Online Forum

Responding to Philip Alston, Does the Past Matter? On the Origins of Human Rights, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 2043 (2013)

Human Rights and History

Jenny S. Martinez



Responding to Neal Kumar Katyal, Stochastic Constraint, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 990 (2013)

A Reply to Professor Katyal

Jack Goldsmith


Responding to David A. Strauss, Not Unwritten, After All?, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1532 (2013)

American Constitutionalism — Written, Unwritten, and Living

Akhil Reed Amar


Reaction

Judicial Review of Targeted Killings

Jameel Jaffer


Reaction

Planning Responses and Defining Attacks in Cyberspace

Evan F. Kohlmann and Rodrigo Bijou



Reaction

Cyberdeterrence

Robert F. Turner


Reaction

Presidential Combat Against Climate Change

Richard J. Lazarus





Harvard Law Review
Gannett House
1511 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138

Editorial Office:
617-495-7889
617-496-5053 (fax)

Business Office:
617-495-4650
617-495-2748 (fax)