International law has long been viewed with suspicion in Anglo-American legal thought. Compared to the paradigm of domestic law, the international legal system seems different and deficient along a number of important dimensions. This Article questions the distinctiveness of international law by pointing out that constitutional law in fact shares all of the features that are supposed to make international law so dubious. In mapping out these commonalities, the Article suggests that the traditional international/domestic distinction may obscure what is, for many purposes, a more important and generative conceptual divide. That divide is between “public law” regimes like international and constitutional law that constitute and govern the behavior of states and governments and “ordinary domestic law” that is administered by and through the governmental institutions of the state.
Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law
- Volume 122
- Issue 7
- May 2009
Topics:
May 1, 2009
More from this Issue
-
Discourse in the Dusk: The Twilight of Religious Freedom?
The challenge of justifying religious freedom within the constraints of modern secular discourse
Vol. 122 No. 7 -
Rationalizing Hard Look Review After the Fact
Vol. 122 No. 7 A fundamental illogic of administrative law is that courts strictly review agencie’s determinations of fact and policy but defer to their interpretations of law. Presumably, the opposite should be the case: judges should pay closer attention to their specialty – the law – and less to areas in which they have no particular expertise, such as those with scientific and technical aspects. -
Organizational Irrationality and Corporate Human Rights Violations
Vol. 122 No. 7 The problem of how to bring transnational corporations within the reach of international law has grown increasingly urgent for human rights scholars and activists. Today, individual corporations can wield as much power and influence as entire nations. Unfortunately, that influence is not necessarily wielded for good, as corporations have been implicated in a broad range of human rights abuses.